Madama Butterfly Review – Opera San Jose’s Provocative Take on Puccini’s Classic Favorite

There is only one possible word to describe Act I of the opera I saw on Sunday, February 16, 2014 – Beautiful. Never has Puccini’s gorgeous music been played with such delicate precision. 

Program Cover; Photo by Chris Ayers.

Program Cover; Photo by Chris Ayers.

Maestro David Rohrbaugh; photo from OSJ archive

Maestro David Rohrbaugh; photo from OSJ archive

Conductor David Rohrbaugh, leading the San Jose Opera Orchestra for his final year before retiring, kept the orchestra in perfect synch with the singers, and his handling of the extended quiet musical passages at the ends of Act I and Act II was exquisite. At the end of Act I the audience paid him the ultimate tribute of withholding their applause until Puccini’s last quiet note had been played and he lowered his arms.

Cast A: Flying panels; photo by Bob Shomler

Cast A: Flying panels; photo by Bob Shomler

The minimalist sets consisted a background scrim, which changed with the seasons, the action, and the time of day, together with three panels which were raised and lowered; sometimes they were translucent windows to indicate the Japanese house with its sliding panels. Other times they would be floral or abstract designs to enhance the back scrim. The only props were a couple of chairs and a tea table, carried on and off by unobtrusive servants. Along with the lighting, the total effect enhanced the stage action but never became obtrusive.

Cast I: Cio-Cio-San and members of the OSJ chorus

Cast I: Cio-Cio-San and members of the OSJ chorus

Madama Butterfly is set in Japan at the end of the 19th century. After centuries of resisting any contact with Western civilization, Japan is just beginning to open up and interact with the rest of the world, but this process is at the upper levels of government and industry; life for ordinary people in Japan is still very different from life for ordinary people in the United States. In particular, the social structure is extremely rigid. The social status of an individual is precisely and immutably fixed by the circumstances of his or her birth. The sons of Royalty will be noblemen; the sons of Warriors will be warriors; the sons of Farmers will be farmers, etc. Society is absolutely sexist – women are inferior to men; period.

The drama and tension in the opera comes from the interaction of the two different cultures – specifically the Japanese geisha Cio-Cio-San and her personal servant Suzuki with Americans Naval Lieutenant Benjamin Franklin Pinkerton and Sharpless, the American Consul. The director of a production can take either of two distinct approaches (or anything in between, of course): take each culture at face value and emphasize the conflict, or search beneath the culture externals to find the commonality, “people are people”.

Stage Director Brad Dalton; photo from OSJ archives

Stage Director Brad Dalton; photo from OSJ archives

Stage Director Brad Dalton has chosen the first extreme, but has implemented it in a far from simple fashion. There is overt conflict in Act I in the encounter between Pinkerton and the Bonze, but it is quickly glossed over. The seeds of future conflict are evident as Pinkerton and Cio-Cio-San clearly indicate the difference in their expectations regarding their marriage – but not to each other.

Cast I: Pinkerton and Cio-Cio-San

Cast I: Pinkerton and Cio-Cio-San

The act ends with both of them extremely happy in each other’s arms.

Act II is all Cio-Cio-San. Three years have passed with no word from Pinkerton. According to Japanese law, he has deserted her and hence ipso factor divorced her. She has a son, Trouble, conceived in wedlock but born after desertion and without his father’s knowledge. Cio-Cio-San remains firm in her faith that Pinkerton will return and they will “live happily ever after” despite the efforts by Suzuki, Sharpless, and the marriage broker Goro to make her face reality.

Cast I: Kate shields Trouble from the sight of his father holding his mother’s

Cast I: Kate shields Trouble from the sight of his father holding his mother’s body

In Act III reality takes over with a vengeance. The act is the antithesis of “Beautiful”. In my opinion it is downright “Ugly” – and frankly, I don’t like it. As I have said before, part of my enjoyment of opera – particularly tragic opera – is emotional. As Cio-Cio-San is preparing to commit harakiri with her father’s ceremonial sword (It is better to die with honor than to live without it) there is a little lump of sadness in my throat at the tragedy of it all. But apparently the sword misses her heart; she is still alive when Pinkerton rushes in, grabs her in his arms and pulls out the sword. Kate, arriving a second later, sees Pinkerton apparently brandishing the sword as if he had killed her. Unbelieving horror is on her face as she grabs Trouble in her arms and stumbles off stage. My own state of gentle sadness is rudely shattered as I share Kate’s horror. I feel emotionally betrayed. I don’t like it.

Cast I: Suzuki and Cio-Cio-San react differently to the sight of Pinkerton’s ship in the harbor

Cast I: Suzuki and Cio-Cio-San react differently to the sight of Pinkerton’s ship in the harbor

Enough negativism. Despite the ending, the production was fascinating and I look forward to seeing it again Sunday with the other cast. There is no question about Cio-Cio-San being the lead role – and soprano Cecilia Violetta López was fully up to the challenge. López doesn’t sound like a typical Japanese name, but she looked and acted the part perfectly. Lisa Chavez’ Suzuki was the perfect foil for the heroine. She did her best to make Cio-Cio-San face reality, but never forgot that she was only a servant and was completely subservient to the wishes and whims of her mistress.

Cast I: Pinkerton and Sharpless

Cast I: Pinkerton and Sharpless

I have seen many, many Butterflys, but this production gave me new insights into both of the male leads. I had always looked at Pinkerton as one of the most despicable characters in all opera for his treatment of Cio-Cio-San, but James Callon makes him seem to be more a victim of his own narrow-minded class. In his culture there are “humans” – meaning white males – and there are “others” who may have many desirable qualities but are not really human. It doesn’t make his actions any less heinous, but responsibility for them is only partly on his own shoulders – his whole culture is at fault.

Cast A: Sharpless joins Pinkerton in a toast to the latter’s upcoming marriage

Cast A: Sharpless joins Pinkerton in a toast to the latter’s upcoming marriage

Zachary Altman’s performance gave me new insight into Sharpless. Previously I had thought of him as basically a nice guy, but weak and ineffectual. He is much worse. In Act I he is an abettor. At the very beginning, before the opera starts, he puts Pinkerton in touch with Goro, the marriage broker, instead of telling Pinkerton he’ll have nothing to do with his nefarious scheme. Even worse, when confronted with Cio-Cio-San’s death and Pinkerton’s professed remorse, he has no support to offer either party, but can only say, “Told you so, told you so; yah, yah; it’s not my fault.” A fine friend!

Cast I: Michael Mendelsohn as Goro; photo by Bob Shomler

Cast I: Michael Mendelsohn as Goro; photo by Bob Shomler

I can’t finish this review without mentioning Michael Mendelsohn who plays the minor role of Goro, the marriage broker. I first saw Michael almost 20 years ago as a regular with Pocket Opera, and in the years between I have seen him in countless roles – usually minor – with Opera San Jose and West Bay Opera. I am always impressed by the way he throws himself into his role – however major or minor it may be. His costume, his wig, his makeup, his stance, and his acting. I always get a little extra dollop of anticipation when I see his name on the program – and I frequently have to double-check the program to verify that I’m really seeing Michael – he seems a totally different person with each role.

Cast A: Cio-Cio-San and members of the women's chorus

Cast A: Cio-Cio-San and members of the women’s chorus

There are still several performances left (see “CAST” below for specific dates) before the final one on March 2. No matter how many previous productions you’ve seen, you owe it to yourself to see this one. But take a tip from me and enjoy it as a work of art – leave your emotions in the lobby. If you come this Sunday, 2/23, look me up in seat B1.

operanut_sig

MADAMA BUTTERFLY: FEB. 15-MAR. 2, 2014

CREATIVE TEAM

Conductor David Rohrbaugh
Assistant Conductor Joseph Marcheso*
*conducts 2/23 and 2/25 performances
Stage Director Brad Dalton
Chorus Master Andrew Whitfield
Set Designer Kent Dorsey
Costume Director Alyssa Oania
Lighting Designer Pamila Gray
Wig & Makeup Designer Jeanna Parham
CAST* Cast A Cast I
Role 2/15, 2/20, 2/23, 2/28 2/16, 2/22, 2/25, 3/2
Cio-Cio-San Jennifer Forni Cecilia Violetta López
Suzuki Nicole Birkland Lisa Chavez
BF Pinkerton Christopher Bengochea James Callon
Sharpless Evan Brummel Zachary Altman
Goro Robert Norman Michael Mendelsohn
Commissioner Silas Elash Silas Elash
The Bonze Matthew Anchel Matthew Anchel
Prince Yamadori Torlef Borsting Torlef Borsting
Kate Pinkerton Carin Gilfry Carin Gilfry
Trouble Owen Neuendorffer Sammy Tittle
Opera San Jose California Theatre
2149 Paragon Drive 345 South First Street
San Jose CA 95131-1312 Betw. San Carlos & San Salvador
408-437-4450 Downtown San Jose

Photos (except as indicated) by P. Kirk

P. S.   Sunday, February 23

There is a certain sybaritic pleasure in seeing a great opera a second time after I have already written my review. I can turn off my critical facilities and concentrate on the pure pleasure of the moment. And pleasure it was to witness Cast A perform this beautiful opera. I usually try to see both casts of OperaSJ, and it has almost always been my experience that there is little to choose between them in terms of my overall enjoyment. If I single out a particular performer by name, it only means that I was particularly impressed by that individual on that date and does not remotely imply that I was dissatisfied by the counterpart from the other cast. That observation is particularly relevant here, because I took my own tip from the end of the main review, and was actively denying all of the emotional tugs on my heart in Act II and the early part of Act III and concentrating on the performance as a piece of art – as a masterpiece of art.

Cast A: Suzuki and Cio-Cio-San

Cast A: Suzuki and Cio-Cio-San

That being said, I was tremendously impressed by Jennifer Forni’s portrayal of Cio-Cio-San in Act III. She has heard voices and rushes on stage brimming with happiness and expecting to find Pinkerton. No Pinkerton. Instead, a triple whammy from Suzuki, Sharpless, and Kate:
Wham – Pinkerton is never coming back.
Wham – That “strange woman” in the garden is his Wife.
Wham – They want to take away her child.

Suzuki can’t take it; she is kneeling with racking sobs and copious tears, but Cio-Cio-San stands straight and tall and proud. “Very well. I will give the child to his father. You (Sharpless, and Kate) leave right now; send Pinkerton up the hill in half an hour. Git!” They git – and Cio-Cio-San collapses to the floor in a paroxysm of grief.

After a bit she quiets down, twitches once or twice, lies still, and then rises in an icy calm:
“Suzuki, where is my son?”
“Playing – I’ll get him.”
“No! Let him play. Leave me. Now!”

(I remind myself – with difficulty – “Don’t get involved. Observe and appreciate. You can’t afford to get involved) Cio-Cio-San picks up her father’s ceremonial sword, reads the inscription with an inscrutable smile on her face. The opera hurtles towards its grisly climax. The orchestra plays Puccini’s final crashing chord as the stage is plunged into total darkness. A beat of stunned silence in the theatre, then wild applause, return of lights, curtain calls as most of us in the audience rise to our feet. I kept from getting emotionally involved with the characters – but I was limp with emotion from the over-all impact of that final scene.

Pleasant dreams, everyone,

operanut_sig

This review by Philip G Hodge appeared in sanfranciscosplash.com on February 22, 2014;
the PS was added February 23.

This entry was posted in Opera Review and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*